But company officials worry privately that increasingly heavy-handed regulation by the Modi government could jeopardise their prospects.Īmong the new rules are requirements that big social media firms appoint Indian citizens to key compliance roles, remove content within 36 hours of a legal order, and set up a mechanism to respond to complaints. WhatsApp, its parent Facebook and tech rivals have all invested heavily in India.
#Watsapp whatsapp code
India's new Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code designates "significant social media intermediaries" as standing to lose protection from lawsuits and criminal prosecution if they fail to adhere to the code. The response of the companies to the new rules has been a subject of intense speculation since they were unveiled in February, 90 days before they were due to come into force. They have yet to comment on India's demand for traceability. While Signal and Telegram downloads have surged in India, neither app commands as massive a user base as WhatsApp. The lawsuit also comes at time many Indians have begun using rival messaging apps such as Signal and Telegram after WhatsApp introduced a new privacy policy earlier this year which allows it to share some data with Facebook and other group firms. India's technology ministry did not respond to a request for comment. Its Indian operations were continuing to operate as normal on Wednesday. WhatsApp said it would continue to engage with the government. company was not being asked to break encryption. The sources familiar with the lawsuit declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue.Ī government official said WhatsApp could find a way to track originators of disinformation, a long-standing stance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration, and that the U.S. "Requiring messaging apps to 'trace' chats is the equivalent of asking us to keep a fingerprint of every single message sent on WhatsApp, which would break end-to-end encryption and fundamentally undermines people's right to privacy," WhatsApp said in a statement when asked to comment on the lawsuit. WhatsApp says that because messages are encrypted end-to-end it would have to break encryption for receivers of messages as well as the originators to comply with the new law. While the new law only requires WhatsApp, which has half a billion users in India, to unmask people credibly accused of wrongdoing, it says it cannot in practice do that alone. New Delhi has also pressed tech companies to remove what it has described as misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic ravaging India, and some criticism of the government's response to the crisis, which is claiming thousands of lives daily.
![watsapp whatsapp watsapp whatsapp](https://cdn-0.smartandroid.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/verrouiller-whatsapp2.png)
The micro-blogging service had labelled posts by a spokesman for India’s dominant party and others as containing “manipulated media”, saying forged content was included. Tensions rose after police visited Twitter’s offices this week. The WhatsApp lawsuit escalates a growing struggle between Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government and tech giants including Facebook, Google's parent Alphabet (GOOGL.O) and Twitter (TWTR.N) in one of their key global growth markets. The case asks the Delhi High Court to declare that one of the new IT rules is a violation of privacy rights in India's constitution since it requires social media companies to identify the "first originator of information" when authorities demand it, people familiar with the lawsuit told Reuters. May 25 (Reuters) - WhatsApp has filed a lawsuit in Delhi against the Indian government seeking to block regulations coming into force on Wednesday that experts say would compel Facebook’s (FB.O) messaging app to break privacy protections, sources said. Challenge escalates tension between govt and tech giants.New rules on media due to take effect on Wednesday.Suit argues rules would end encryption of messaging for all - sources.
![watsapp whatsapp watsapp whatsapp](https://www.analyticsinsight.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Watsapp.jpg)
Suit argues rules violate constitutional privacy protection -sources.